As we await the constitution of the new convocation of the Parliament, we provide a comparative overview of the previous MPs’ work.
Our analysis of the annual reports of the Parliament in the last four years has shown a continuous increase in extraordinary sessions of the Parliament, alongside control hearings.
The outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic has affected the intensity of parliamentary activity: in 2020, twice as many laws were passed compared to the average of the other three years.
However, mechanism of parliamentary questions was the least utilised during the previous year, 2022, during which votes of no confidence passed in the 42nd and 43rd Government of Montenegro.
On the other hand, parliamentary committees worked the longest in 2021, with the Committee on Economy, Finance, and Budget being the most active, while the highest number of sessions was held back in 2019, with the Legislative Committee leading with 49 sessions. The fewest amount of sessions were held in 2020.
Overall, the Anti-corruption Committee is the least active parliamentary committee. Its passivity is particularly noticeable during 2020, 2021, and 2022. The Committee on European Integration is also among the least active committees, even though it is another working body with a so-called horizontal mandate to oversee the process of Montenegro’s harmonization with EU standards.
Furthermore, the recognised trend of increasing legislative initiatives by MPs from 2019 to 2022 indicates the necessity of closer regulation of the law-making process, considering that they are not obliged to conduct public consultations and regulatory impact assessments.
On June 19 and 20, Institute Alternative organised a meeting of the National working group for monitoring public administration reform in Montenegro. During the meeting, the results of the last monitoring cycle of the public administration reform for 2021/2022 were presented, as part of the WeBER 2.0 project.
The workshop for civil society organisations entitled “Citizens first in public administration reform in Montenegro” was held in Petrovac. This event brought together 25 participants, representatives of the non-governmental sector. In addition to the results of the last monitoring cycle for the year 2021/2022, previous findings and results of the WeBER project were also presented.
In addition to representatives of civil society organisations, representatives of institutions also participated in the workshop – Marija Hajduković (Ministry of Public Administration), Luka Đuričković (Ministry of Finance) and Boris Rebić (UNDP). Representatives of institutions presented the results on the implementation of strategic documents in the field of public administration reform and public finance management, as well as the current state of play in the field of e-services. The participants of the workshop also got acquainted with the change of approach in monitoring the public administration reform by the SIGMA/OECD initiative, whose revised principles were presented by Jesper Johnson.
WeBER 2.0 project – Western Balkan Civil Society Empowerment for a Reformed Public Administration – is dedicated to strengthening participatory democracy through greater engagement of civil society in policy development and implementation of public administration reform in the Western Balkans. WeBER in Montenegro is led by the Institute Alternative, and at the regional level it consists of partners from the Think for Europe (TEN) network, with the support of the European Policy Center (EPC) from Brussels.
Milena Muk, a public policy researcher at the Institute Alternative (IA) was one of the panelists at the conference “Rule of law monitoring for EU countries and candidates: Bridging the Gap”, in Skopje, North Macedonia, organised by the European Policy Institute (EPI).
During the panel, Muk stated that Montenegro finds itself in an unprecedented situation, primarily due to the change of government that occurred after 30 years of single-party dominance.
Milena Muk
Advancements in the legal framework, particularly the introduction of a qualified majority in parliament for the appointment to the highest judicial authorities, have not prevented unjust interference in the functioning of the judiciary, as shown in the example of Montenegro.
On the other hand, Muk stated that certain progress has been made, when it comes to opening high-level cases of corruption and organised crime, despite certain legal changes after 2020, which were criticised by the European Commission. However, she pointed out that it is difficult to measure the impartiality of the prosecution, as it can not be expressed numerically through the number of cases initiated against members of the old and new parliamentary majorities. Therefore, Muk concludes that it is important to cross-check the evaluations of the prosecution’s work with different stakeholders, especially civil society organisations and the wider professional community, alongside the public perspective.
The conference in Skopje was opened by the director of the European Policy Institute Simonida Kacarska, the Swedish ambassador to North Macedonia Ami Larson Jan, and the Deputy Ministre of Justice of North Macedonia Viktorija Avramovska Madić. In addition to Muk, the panel featured the representative of the European Partnership for Democracy (EPD) from Brussels, Carolin Johnson, as well as Arberesha Loxha Stublla from the Group for Legal and Political Studies from Prishtina and Denis Preshova from the Faculty of Law in Skopje.
Human Rights Action (HRA), Association Spektra, Centre for Civic Education (CCE), Centre for Monitoring and Research, Women’s Rights Centre (WRC), Centre for Civil Liberties, Centre for Democracy and Human Rights, Centre for Investigative Journalism, Centre for Development of NGOs, European Association for Law and Finance (EALF), Institute Alternative (IA), Juventas, Media Centre, Montenegro Media Institute (MMI), PRIMA, Trade Union of Media of Montenegro, Society of Professional Journalists and Queer Montenegro are protesting the unlawful re-election of Boris Raonić as Director of RTCG and calling on the members of the RTCG Council who participated in the election to resign from public functions due to the fact that they ignored the final court decision, placing private interests before those of the public.
It is unacceptable for any public official, including members of the Public Service Council, to abuse public office by ignoring final court decisions and disregarding the rule of law.
Foto: Vijesti
In this specific case, the court recently overturned the decision on the election of Boris Raonić as Director of RTCG, finding that he should not have been elected to that position in 2021 because – as a member of the Council of the Agency for Electronic Communications – he was in conflict of interest at the time he applied for the competition and at the time of the election. However, President of the RTCG Council Veselin Drljević and members of the RTCG Council Amina Murić, Predrag Miranović, Naod Zorić and Filip Lazović have now been re-elected him to the same position, acting contrary to the final court decision and their duty to respect the instructions from the decisions of the competent court as prescribed by Article 34 paragraph 2 of the Law on National Public Broadcasters. Namely, the Law clearly stipulates that “no one has the right to influence the work of a member of the Council in any way, nor is a member of the Council obliged to follow anyone’s instructions regarding his/her work, except for the decisions of the competent court”.
There is no doubt as to how the instruction from the final judgment reads. The High Court in Podgorica very precisely pointed out that “the legal consequences of overturning the decision on appointment are: a re-election from among the candidates who had applied, or the annulment of the competition, in which procedure the defendant shall have the opportunity to reconsider the remaining applications and decide in accordance with the law”. Based on this decision, the RTCG Council had only two options: (1) to annul the competition and announce a new one or (2) to elect one of the remaining candidates as part of the disputed competition. The RTCG Council, however, decided to repeat the election process including all the original candidates and elect the person regarding whom the court had already conclusively determined that he does not meet the requirements prescribed by the competition in question. By electing candidates based on the requirements from the 2021 competition, and including Raonić among them, the above five members of the Council knowingly abused their official positions and caused damage to the public interest.
Montenegro must establish the rule of law at all levels of all public services, including the national broadcaster. All public officials, including members of the RTCG Council, must respect court decisions, and it is very dangerous for the entire system when they are the ones who mock the rule of law. We therefore believe that the first step in the attempt to return the work of the Public Service to the legal framework would be for these five members of the Council to resign immediately and continue their careers away from any public office. Their remaining in those positions would not only damage the reputation of the RTCG Public Service, but also the state of Montenegro – which will undoubtedly be noted in all relevant international reports.
Human Rights Action (HRA) Association Spektra Centre for Civic Education (CCE) Centre for Monitoring and Research Women’s Rights Centre (WRC) Centre for Civil Liberties Centre for Democracy and Human Rights Centre for Investigative Journalism Centre for Development of NGOs European Association for Law and Finance (EALF) Institute Alternative (IA) Juventas Media centre Montenegro Media Institute (MMI) PRIMA Trade Union of Media of Montenegro Society of Professional Journalists Queer Montenegro
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok
The outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic has affected the intensity of parliamentary activity: in 2020, twice as many laws were passed compared to the average of the other three years.
WeBER 2.0 project – Western Balkan Civil Society Empowerment for a Reformed Public Administration – is dedicated to strengthening participatory democracy through greater engagement of civil society in policy development and implementation of public administration reform in the Western Balkans. WeBER in Montenegro is led by the Institute Alternative, and at the regional level it consists of partners from the Think for Europe (TEN) network, with the support of the European Policy Center (EPC) from Brussels. 
